The Lies Surrounding The 1955 Cutter Incident During The Polio Epidemic in America

Follow us on social media

“Vaccines are safe and effective”

The “Cutter Incident” in 1955 involved a flaw in the Salk polio vaccine manufacturing process at Cutter Laboratories, which subsequently led to the production of substantial amounts of what was thought to be “an inactivated vaccine that contained live poliovirus”.

The result has been called “…one of the worst pharmaceutical disasters in US history”[11], with 40,000 cases of polio resulting in 51 cases of permanent paralysis and five deaths among vaccinated individuals, and 113 cases of paralysis and five deaths among contacts of vaccinated individuals

Vaccine injury table

Yes, a vaccine injury table exists. It’s always existed…Well, since mass manufacturing of vaccines…

There are proven adverse events from vaccines. They’ve been compensated for in vaccine court. 4 billion+ from tax payers has been paid out for injury and death following vaccines. This criminal enterprise became obvious in 1986 when Reagan gave vaccine manufacturers immunity from lawsuits. Since gaining immunity from federal litigation the vaccine schedule tripled. Each liability free vaccine added to the childhood schedule is worth billions of dollars for the makers.

For child death reports, 79.4% received >1 vaccine on the same day. Inactivated influenza vaccine given alone was most commonly associated with death reports in adults (51.4%).

If they really cared about our children’s health, the law that protects vaccine makers would be repealed.

Please sign and share.


For years there has been debate about the long-term persistence of viruses and other proteins, and their potential to produce chronic disease (i.e. instead of producing a genuine immunity)

Vaccines are altering the body’s systemic and biochemical stability, suppressing the production of differing types of white blood cells, causing impaired immune function.

Furthermore, the introduction of many vaccines recommended in the CDC childhood schedule (up to 72 doses administered in 16 shots) introduce a large number of foreign proteins, which may be sufficient to ensure that immune function never returns to baseline, [and/or] altering basic immune biochemistry.

Consequently there now exists a growing concern which links immunizations to the huge increase in recent decades of auto-immune diseases [79] e.g., rheumatoid arthritis[80,81], multiple sclerosis, lupus erythematosus, lymphoma, leukemia, autoimmune demyelinative optic neuritis, diabetes mellitus, etc.

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome has been largely eradicated following withdrawal of the pertussis vaccine in Sweden and Japan.

Side-effects arising from vaccination are associated with the onset of autoimmune disease[79,119], arthritis, diabetes mellitus, autoimmune demyelinative optic neuritis, etc.

Sensory defects are a common side-effect of vaccines[120–122] e.g. sensori-neural hearing loss induced by the MMR vaccine.

A sample of vaccine and injectable medication tragedies in the US during my lifetime

Doctors baby die following vaccines.

Over a 1000 studies on dangers of vaccines.

It’s NOT settled.

Infectious diseases declined prior to mass vaccinations due to better livingstandards, clean water, better nutrition and plumbing. More info coming soon!

Related Articles

Deleterious Effects of Vaccines – 100s of resources

How can evidence be ignored?…

The HPV Vaccine: An Ethical Dilemma

In 2014 there were numerous reports of mass hysteria and mystery illnesses spreading around the small town of El Carmen De Bolivar, Colombia. According to an article published by CBS, there was a steady increase of young women being hospitalized in this small town, all of which reported the same symptoms of fainting, numbness and tingling of the hands and feet, and headaches. Speculations about the Gardasil vaccination arose, but were disregarded by the mayor of the town stating that “there is no evidence the vaccine, which has undergone extensive testing and regulation is to blame” (CBS, 2014). According to this statement, he is not necessarily wrong, because the clinical trials of this vaccine have been proven to have misleading conclusions due to errors in the study design.

COVID Reference

Six weeks after the third edition, the world has changed again.
The pandemic is raging in South America, particularly in Brazil,
Ecuador and Peru. SARS-CoV-2 is under control in China, but in
Iran it is not. And in Europe, where most countries have weathered
the first wave and open borders to save a compromised tourist season, is now wondering if and for how long this biological
drôle de guerre could last.

Science has moved ahead, too. We have seen a more complex
picture of COVID-19 and new clinical syndromes; the first data
from vaccine trials; first results from randomized controlled
drug studies; encouraging publications on monoclonal neutralizing antibodies and serological evidence about the number of people who have come into contact with SARS-CoV-2. Unfortunately, we have also seen the first science scandal with fake data published in highly ranked journals. And we face new challenges like long-term effects of COVID-19 and a Kawasaki-like inflammatory multisystem syndrome in children.

For quite some time, prevention will continue to be the primary
pillar of pandemic control. In future waves of the SARS-CoV-2
pandemic, we will focus on the conditions under which SARSCoV-
2 is best transmitted: crowded, closed (and noisy) places and
spaces. Although hospitals are not noisy, they are crowded and
closed, and the battle against the new coronavirus will be decided
at the very center of our healthcare system. Over the next
months and maybe years, one of all of our top priorities will be
to give all healthcare workers and patients perfect personal protective equipment.

New insights on the antiviral effects of chloroquine against coronavirus: what to expect for COVID-19?

Recently, a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), officially known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in China. Despite drastic containment measures, the spread of this virus is ongoing. SARS-CoV-2 is the aetiological agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) characterised by pulmonary infection in humans. The efforts of international health authorities have since focused on rapid diagnosis and isolation of patients as well as the search for therapies able to counter the most severe effects of the disease. In the absence of a known efficient therapy and because of the situation of a public health emergency, it made sense to investigate the possible effect of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine against SARS-CoV-2 since this molecule was previously described as a potent inhibitor of most coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-1. Preliminary trials of chloroquine repurposing in the treatment of COVID- 19 in China have been encouraging, leading to several new trials. Here we discuss the possible mechanisms of chloroquine interference with the SARS-CoV-2 replication cycle.