The CIA Created The Term “Conspiracy Theorist” To Silence Critics Of JFK Assassination

Follow us on social media

This is an official CIA report written in 1967 titled “Countering the Criticisms of the Warren Report”

The U.S. was worried about people questioning the JFK assassination and this is how they dealt with it.

There are a few important things to point out about this.

Part 3 basically says not to bring the assassination up. Reply if someone brings it up, but follow these guidelines to script your response.

Part 3a, describes the first action recommended to respond to ANY question challenging the official narrative.
It says only to bring it up with “liaison and friendly elite contacts”. (Newspapers, TV News stations, politicians etc.)

Part3b literally states to “employ propaganda assets to answer and refute the critics”.
In response to anyone who dares to question the official narrative, be sure paint the image that all critics are
1: wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in.
2: politically interested
3: financially interested
4: hasty and inaccurate in their research
5: infatuated with their own theories

So part 3 says, “hey, don’t bring this up unless it’s with people who have vested interests in agreeing with the official narrative. Wouldn’t want someone that’s not paid by us to connect the dots and reveal the truth.
When anyone who isn’t paid by us questions, DO NOT RESPOND TO THEIR CLAIMS, or look into their validity. They are communist propaganda. Do not debate them or give them a chance to elaborate on their points though.”

This same strategy is used against anything questioning what the mainstream media says on any/every controversial issue.

That’s why I don’t believe anything at all from the mainstream media; and it’s also why I find it so sad to see many of my friends and family eating up their propaganda and parroting the views word for word as if they’re their own.

Think for yourself, or they’ll subconsciously program you to think whatever benefits them and keeps those in power from losing it.

The whole report is linked here. Make your own assertions about what you read, but the information is there for anyone who may be interested.

Related Articles

The HPV Vaccine: An Ethical Dilemma

In 2014 there were numerous reports of mass hysteria and mystery illnesses spreading around the small town of El Carmen De Bolivar, Colombia. According to an article published by CBS, there was a steady increase of young women being hospitalized in this small town, all of which reported the same symptoms of fainting, numbness and tingling of the hands and feet, and headaches. Speculations about the Gardasil vaccination arose, but were disregarded by the mayor of the town stating that “there is no evidence the vaccine, which has undergone extensive testing and regulation is to blame” (CBS, 2014). According to this statement, he is not necessarily wrong, because the clinical trials of this vaccine have been proven to have misleading conclusions due to errors in the study design.

COVID Reference

Six weeks after the third edition, the world has changed again.
The pandemic is raging in South America, particularly in Brazil,
Ecuador and Peru. SARS-CoV-2 is under control in China, but in
Iran it is not. And in Europe, where most countries have weathered
the first wave and open borders to save a compromised tourist season, is now wondering if and for how long this biological
drôle de guerre could last.

Science has moved ahead, too. We have seen a more complex
picture of COVID-19 and new clinical syndromes; the first data
from vaccine trials; first results from randomized controlled
drug studies; encouraging publications on monoclonal neutralizing antibodies and serological evidence about the number of people who have come into contact with SARS-CoV-2. Unfortunately, we have also seen the first science scandal with fake data published in highly ranked journals. And we face new challenges like long-term effects of COVID-19 and a Kawasaki-like inflammatory multisystem syndrome in children.

For quite some time, prevention will continue to be the primary
pillar of pandemic control. In future waves of the SARS-CoV-2
pandemic, we will focus on the conditions under which SARSCoV-
2 is best transmitted: crowded, closed (and noisy) places and
spaces. Although hospitals are not noisy, they are crowded and
closed, and the battle against the new coronavirus will be decided
at the very center of our healthcare system. Over the next
months and maybe years, one of all of our top priorities will be
to give all healthcare workers and patients perfect personal protective equipment.

“We Have A Lot of Evidence That It’s A Fake Story All Over The World” – German Doctors on COVID-19

This group has been giving multiple conferences in Germany, in one of the most recent, Dr. Heiko Schöning, one of the organizations leaders, stated that “We have a lot of evidence that it (the new coronavirus) is a fake story all over the world.” To put it in context, he wasn’t referring to the virus being fake, but simply that it’s no more dangerous than the seasonal flu (or just as dangerous) and that there is no justification for the measures being taken to combat it.

Responses