CDC Approved New Vaccine Knowing That It May Cause Heart Attacks

Follow us on social media

In a 2018 CDC ACIP meeting they unanimously approved a new vaccine (Heplislav-B) that uses a new adjuvant containing synthetic DNA. They also mention concerns about a myocardial infarction (heart attack) signal, but decide to monitor those concerns post-marketing. This means they know there is a chance this vaccine will cause heart attacks, but they approved it anyways.

Many people seem to be under the assumption that before a vaccine is made available for the public the manufacturers and the CDC do extensive testing to assure it’s safety and efficacy. This is simply not the case. 

This video is a great example of just how clueless the people who form our vaccine policy truly are. They admit that they have no preclinical data to support whether it’s safe to give this vaccine with other adjuvanted vaccines, but say their general recommendation is that they can be given at the same time in different limbs. These are not science or fact based recommendations. They’re profit based recommendations.

They go on to use their “voting machine things” to unanimously approve this new vaccine for Hepatitis-B.

After they approve it, they remember to mention the minor detail that this vaccine may cause heart attacks. After a unanimous vote to approve this new vaccine, Dr. Stephens says:
“I am concerned about the myocardial infarction signal. I am concerned about the use of this new adjuvant and certainly urge us to continue to look at the post-marketing data carefully”.

So in other words, he knows this may cause heart attacks, and is unsure about the safety of the new adjuvant (which contains synthetic DNA), but he wants the American public to be the Guinea pigs and find out. Once again; this is all for profit, not for our health.

The fact that the “experts” give recommendations that have no scientific data to support them, and the fact that they’re willing to monitor the risk of heart attacks on a product in post-marketing surveillance should send a shiver down your spine.

The CDC does not care if people have heart attacks from the vaccines that they personally recommend. The CDC does not care that there are no studies proving it’s safe to inject synthetic DNA into children. They do not care that they have no studies proving it’s safe to use this vaccine with other adjuvnted vaccines. They’ll just worry about those minor inconveniences post-marketing; after the product has harmed countless Americans and made Big Pharma a fortune.

Related Articles

The HPV Vaccine: An Ethical Dilemma

In 2014 there were numerous reports of mass hysteria and mystery illnesses spreading around the small town of El Carmen De Bolivar, Colombia. According to an article published by CBS, there was a steady increase of young women being hospitalized in this small town, all of which reported the same symptoms of fainting, numbness and tingling of the hands and feet, and headaches. Speculations about the Gardasil vaccination arose, but were disregarded by the mayor of the town stating that “there is no evidence the vaccine, which has undergone extensive testing and regulation is to blame” (CBS, 2014). According to this statement, he is not necessarily wrong, because the clinical trials of this vaccine have been proven to have misleading conclusions due to errors in the study design.

COVID Reference

Six weeks after the third edition, the world has changed again.
The pandemic is raging in South America, particularly in Brazil,
Ecuador and Peru. SARS-CoV-2 is under control in China, but in
Iran it is not. And in Europe, where most countries have weathered
the first wave and open borders to save a compromised tourist season, is now wondering if and for how long this biological
drôle de guerre could last.

Science has moved ahead, too. We have seen a more complex
picture of COVID-19 and new clinical syndromes; the first data
from vaccine trials; first results from randomized controlled
drug studies; encouraging publications on monoclonal neutralizing antibodies and serological evidence about the number of people who have come into contact with SARS-CoV-2. Unfortunately, we have also seen the first science scandal with fake data published in highly ranked journals. And we face new challenges like long-term effects of COVID-19 and a Kawasaki-like inflammatory multisystem syndrome in children.

For quite some time, prevention will continue to be the primary
pillar of pandemic control. In future waves of the SARS-CoV-2
pandemic, we will focus on the conditions under which SARSCoV-
2 is best transmitted: crowded, closed (and noisy) places and
spaces. Although hospitals are not noisy, they are crowded and
closed, and the battle against the new coronavirus will be decided
at the very center of our healthcare system. Over the next
months and maybe years, one of all of our top priorities will be
to give all healthcare workers and patients perfect personal protective equipment.

Deleterious Effects of Vaccines – 100s of resources

How can evidence be ignored?…