Are Aborted Fetal Cell Lines Used In Vaccines? The Proof Is In The Pudding

Follow us on social media

Many people assume the claim that aborted fetal cell lines are used in vaccines is “anti-vax propaganda”. Prominent figures, such as Senator Steve Sweeney (D-NJ) have claimed that these cell lines were used in the past, but the practice has been discontinued. This is certainly not the case.

Senator Steve Sweeney (D-NJ) falsely claims that aborted fetal cell lines were used in the 50’s & 60’s but “they don’t do that anymore”. When a reporter corrects him, he doubles down on his statement. This statement is blatantly, demonstrably false.

In fact, multiple vaccines currently on the market contain MRC-5 cells (a diploid human cell culture line composed of fibroblasts, originally developed from research deriving lung tissue of a 14 week old aborted Caucasian male fetus), or WI-38 cells (a diploid human cell line composed of fibroblasts derived from lung tissue of a 3-month-gestation aborted female fetus).

This is not anti-vax propaganda. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is a 100% verifiable fact.

Here is a full excipient table listing all ingredients of every vaccine currently on the market (accurate as of Feb. 2020) : https://rb.gy/ubpjsc

To some this is a moral dilemma. To others, they are concerned about the potential biological impacts of injecting male DNA into female babies (& vice versa).

To some this is no big deal. But to others, this can be quite a shocking revelation, and may change their views on vaccinations.

I can’t tell you how many people I’ve spoken with who identify as pro-life, yet think people who question the safety of vaccines are quacks or conspiracy nuts. Some even support mandatory vaccinations.

I wonder if they would change their mind if they were aware these cells were used in vaccines? There is an undeniable sense of irony in claiming to be pro-life, while simultaneously promoting the use of a product that contains cells originally derived from aborted children.

Whether you’re pro-choice, pro-life, or somewhere in the middle we should all be pro-truth.

And the truth is that vaccines do, in fact, contain aborted fetal cell lines.

Related Articles

The HPV Vaccine: An Ethical Dilemma

In 2014 there were numerous reports of mass hysteria and mystery illnesses spreading around the small town of El Carmen De Bolivar, Colombia. According to an article published by CBS, there was a steady increase of young women being hospitalized in this small town, all of which reported the same symptoms of fainting, numbness and tingling of the hands and feet, and headaches. Speculations about the Gardasil vaccination arose, but were disregarded by the mayor of the town stating that “there is no evidence the vaccine, which has undergone extensive testing and regulation is to blame” (CBS, 2014). According to this statement, he is not necessarily wrong, because the clinical trials of this vaccine have been proven to have misleading conclusions due to errors in the study design.

COVID Reference

Six weeks after the third edition, the world has changed again.
The pandemic is raging in South America, particularly in Brazil,
Ecuador and Peru. SARS-CoV-2 is under control in China, but in
Iran it is not. And in Europe, where most countries have weathered
the first wave and open borders to save a compromised tourist season, is now wondering if and for how long this biological
drôle de guerre could last.

Science has moved ahead, too. We have seen a more complex
picture of COVID-19 and new clinical syndromes; the first data
from vaccine trials; first results from randomized controlled
drug studies; encouraging publications on monoclonal neutralizing antibodies and serological evidence about the number of people who have come into contact with SARS-CoV-2. Unfortunately, we have also seen the first science scandal with fake data published in highly ranked journals. And we face new challenges like long-term effects of COVID-19 and a Kawasaki-like inflammatory multisystem syndrome in children.

For quite some time, prevention will continue to be the primary
pillar of pandemic control. In future waves of the SARS-CoV-2
pandemic, we will focus on the conditions under which SARSCoV-
2 is best transmitted: crowded, closed (and noisy) places and
spaces. Although hospitals are not noisy, they are crowded and
closed, and the battle against the new coronavirus will be decided
at the very center of our healthcare system. Over the next
months and maybe years, one of all of our top priorities will be
to give all healthcare workers and patients perfect personal protective equipment.

Deleterious Effects of Vaccines – 100s of resources

How can evidence be ignored? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878266/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377033 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24995277 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099159 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19106436 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774468/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3697751/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299355 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21907498 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17674242 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15780490 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16870260…

Responses