Follow us on social media
So I can refuse a vaccination if it is for a disease that will kill me, but I can’t refuse a vaccination for a contagious disease that I don’t have, or already had, that could possibly kill you if I get it, but can’t, or won’t, because I don’t have it, or already had it.
What? If I haven’t had it, someone could give it to me and I might never know I had it. Since my immune system performs better than yours, I must inject myself with a concoction to theoretically protect you, even though the concoction could/might kill me? The world is full of possibilities and logical fallacies. How are his arguments still standing? “If the vaccination is only to prevent a disease YOU will get, for example, if there is a disease that will kill You, you have a right to refuse that.” “But you have No Right to refuse to be vaccinated against a contagious disease.”
Is the AIDS shot gonna be mandatory too?
On a side note, no one can spread a disease. We are told it is the virus that is transmitted from person to person. Therefore, you cannot give anyone a disease. That is up to your immune system or lack thereof.